http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/114906424617700.xml&coll=2&thispage=1
Lorain kept election schedule; Cuyahoga problems
snowballed
May 31, 2006
Joan Mazzolini
Plain Dealer Reporter
A lot had to happen, on time, for the May 2 primary election
to be successful in Cuyahoga and Lorain counties.
Both counties were using Diebold's new optical scanners to
count absentee ballots, so they had technical challenges to overcome.
Both counties had to modify the machines, wiring them
directly into elections computers to bypass the limited capacity in the machines'
memory cards.
Both counties also needed big stacks of test ballots to run
through the machines to see if they counted accurately.
Both counties needed to test the machines well before
Election Day, leaving enough time to fix anything that did not work.
But only one county, Lorain, met the deadline. Cuyahoga was
a step behind from the start and never caught up.
The result was that Lorain County voters learned the results
of their elections May 2. Cuyahoga voters waited five more days.
Lorain County had one advantage. It had the four optical
scanners it needed on hand six months before Election Day. Cuyahoga County,
nearly five times the size of Lorain, received five machines from the secretary
of state's office in January, but it had been lobbying for more since late
December.
After months of back-and-forth discussions, Cuyahoga
received 15 more optical scan machines April 14, just 18 days before the
primary.
"Things were running late," said Michael Vu,
director of the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections. "But it was more
global, it wasn't just localized to the board."
One of the key problems involved the memory cards for the
machines. They did not have the capacity to hold the 2,000 different ballots
to be used in Cuyahoga County for the primary.
Diebold consultants in both counties told election officials
they were pushing the state to approve modifying the machines to get around the
memory cards. The modification, used in other states, wires the machine to
election computers, which contain all forms of the ballots.
Ohio's Board of Voting Machine Examiners certified the
modifications in mid-February.
But the two counties differed in their approach to the changes.
Lorain elections officials ordered the equipment they needed
from Diebold on April 12, said Marilyn A. Jacobcik, director of the Lorain
County Board of Elections.
The equipment arrived the next day, on April 13, and the
county's four machines were wired into elections computers that afternoon,
Jacobcik said.
Cuyahoga County went to other vendors for the equipment and
didn't get everything it needed until April 25, seven days before the primary.
"We received something from Diebold showing the cost would
be nearly $6,000," Vu said. "Anything over $5,000 we have to
bid."
Vu said two other vendors came in less than $6,000.
Going with another vendor created a new problem, with board
officials needing confirmation from Diebold that they were buying the right
equipment.
"We tried to get confirmation on April 10 . . . but we
didn't get a response back until April 18," Vu said.
Then, Vu said, the Diebold consultant adapting the machines
didn't get training on the conversion until April 22.
"We're now a week away from the election," Vu
said. The modifications were not complete until April 28 or 29, four days
before the primary.
Even if the machines had been ready earlier, Cuyahoga County
didn't have ballots to conduct tests.
Lorain election officials ordered their absentee and test
ballots in early January and had the absentee ballots in hand by early April,
the same time Cuyahoga's four-member board was getting around to picking a
printer to do the ballots.
The test ballots for Lorain arrived April 14, and by the
19th, the testing of the optical scan machines was complete.
"It was a little later than we would have liked,"
Jacobcik said of the testing. But she said the conversion from punch ballots to
electronic voting "was a learning experience."
In Cuyahoga County, elections officials and Diebold
representatives were worrying in mid-April that their test ballots wouldn't
arrive in time.
The printer, MCR Inc., gave assurances to the county, but
the test ballots did not arrive until April 30, two days before the primary.
On May 1, testing began. By 2:30 a.m. Election Day,
elections officials realized that machines were not counting accurately and
decided not to use them.
Instead, temporary workers began hand-counting 15,000
absentee ballots on Election Day. They finished five days later.
To reach this Plain Dealer Reporter:
jmazzolini@plaind.com, 216-999-4563
© 2006 cleveland.com All Rights Reserved.