http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/08/nyregion/08vote.html?_r=1&ref=nyregion&oref=slogin
The New York Times
May 8, 2007
By JONATHAN P. HICKS
Despite earlier predictions to the contrary, New York State
could well replace its aging voting machines by September 2008, a co-chairman
of the New York State Board of Elections said yesterday.
Douglas A. Kellner, one of two board chairmen, said after a Congressional
hearing held in City Hall that state officials were now reviewing the voting
machines of five companies. He said that while there was little to no chance
that new machines would be in place by the state’s presidential primary in
February, they could be installed by the November 2008 presidential election
and possibly in time for the primary elections for Congress and the State
Legislature in September 2008.
Earlier this year, an association of county election
officials passed a resolution urging the state to wait until 2009 to install
new electronic voting machines. At that time, Mr. Kellner said that most
members of the Board of Elections agreed that it would be better if the state
did not have to make such sweeping changes amid the 2008 presidential election,
when a high turnout is anticipated.
“If the equipment that has been submitted for testing
passes, then we will have a timeline that we can meet to have new equipment in
place for the 2008 election,” Mr. Kellner said yesterday. “If we certify the
new machines by December, they should be able to get most of the system in
place for the November 2008 election. And I think the September primary, too.”
Mr. Kellner made his comments after the Congressional
hearing held by the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Information
Policy, Census, and National Archives. The subcommittee chairman, William Lacy
Clay Jr. of Missouri, and Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, both Democrats,
called together a number of experts on ways for the federal government to
ensure the accuracy and security of electronic voting machines.
The issue of replacing the state’s voting machines has been
a thorny one over the last few years. New York is the last state to update its
voting machines, despite a federal mandate requiring it to do so.
“I believe that New York was correctly cautious about
converting their lever machines to electronic ones,” Mr. Clay said. “The old
ones apparently have worked pretty well for the State of New York since the
1920s without any major malfunctions. They want to ensure that New York voters’
votes are actually counted correctly. For them to have waited and to have made
sure that everything is in place is a good thing.”
Much of the delay in updating the machines has been due to
questions about the work of a laboratory that was hired to help test the
machines being offered by five bidders.
Mr. Kellner also said that it was unlikely that the Board of
Elections would continue its contract with the laboratory, Ciber Inc., the
nation’s largest tester of voting machine software.
Earlier this year, the state board suspended Ciber’s work
after The New York Times reported that federal officials had found deficiencies
in its practices and had stalled its application for temporary accreditation
under a new oversight program.
“The decision on whether Ciber continues will be made in the
next month,” Mr. Kellner said. “But it is unlikely that Ciber will be continued
as the testing authority in New York.”
Mac J. Slingerlend, the president and chief executive of
Ciber, testified at yesterday’s hearing, defending the company’s work and
stating that the company’s testing followed federal guidelines. He added that
the work was complicated by the frequent changes in the guidelines over the
last five years. The company has maintained that most of the problems have been
fixed.
Several voting machine experts testified yesterday about a
number of problems concerning new electronic voting machines, including
conflicts of interest in the testing as well as questions about the security
and reliability of some of the machines now in use.
“I have come to the conclusion that the federal
certification process is not adequate,” said David Wagner, a professor of
computer science at the University of California at Berkeley.
“The testing labs are failing to weed out insecure and
unreliable voting systems,” Mr. Wagner said in his testimony. “The federal
certification process has approved systems that have lost thousands of votes
and systems with serious security vulnerabilities.”
Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company